IMPLANTOLOGY: Tables

Table I:

Patients (n = 131)
Age/Years	Female	Male
17-78	84	47

Table II:

Prosthetics (n = 131)
Single Tooth	FPD < 4	FPD > 4	O.D.
30	20	43	38

Table III:

Implants (n = 456)
	No.	Type	Success	Loss
	15	D2	15	0
	110	D3	109	1
	304	D4	302	2
	27	C-h	27	0
Total: 456		453	3

Table IV: 1 Stage:

BONE REMODELING / BIOLOGIC WIDTH (n = 57)
Bone Loss (mm)	No.
	0	4
	0.5 mm	18
	1.0 mm	35

Table V: 2 Stage:

BONE REMODELING (n = 396) STAGE I – STAGE II
Bone Loss (mm)	No
	0	383
	0.5 mm	5
	1.0 mm	4
	2.0 mm	1
	2.5 mm	2
	3.0 mm	1

Table VI: Early loading success:

Implants	Success	Loss
453	453	0
No.	Success	Loss
131	131	0

Table VIII: Early loading bone loss:

2 Stage (n = 396)	0.71 mm
1 Stage (n = 57)	0.55 mm

Table IX: Comparison of functional thread surface area (without coatings and all implants are 1 mm length):

STANDARD DIAMETERS
	BioHorizonsa	Nobel BioCareb	Paragonc	Steri-Ossd
Type	(a) D3	Standard fixture	Screw-Vent	Threaded Implant
	(b) D4
Diameter mm	4	3.75	3.75	3.8
Thread surface area	(a) 210	127	151	111
	(b)245
Type	(a) D3	Wide Platform	Screw-Vent	Threaded Implant
	(b) D4
Diameter mm	5	5.5	4.7	5
Thread surface area	(a) 210	183	192	134
	(b)245
a BioHorizonst Implant Systems, Inc. Birmingham, AL 35243
b NobelBioCare, Inc. Westmont, IL 60559
c ParagonTm Implant Company, Encino CA 91436
d Steri-Oss Yorba Linda, CA 92887